Hebdo Hypocrisy! Charlie Hebdo, Famous for anti-Christian & anti-Islamic Cartoons, Once Fired Cartoonist for Mild anti-Semitism
Hazard a guess which Abrahamic religion, French satirical weekly magazine Charlie Hebdo did NOT lampoon or insult with its cartoons.
Hint: It wasn’t Christianity or Islam.
1. The Hypocrisy of Hebdo’s Hatred – by EKP staff writer
3. Charlie Hebdo Perverts freedom through Anti-Christian Hate Speech – by the Catholic League
The Hypocrisy of Hebdo’s Hatred
Look, I am no fan of radical Islam and recognise it for the threat it is, but this Charlie Hebdo nonsense is starting to really try my patience!
From Jesus depicted performing fellatio on a camel, Mohammed having sex with children and vice versa; worse still, Jesus depicted raping his father (GOD) in order to promote Gay Marriage in France, Charlie Hebdo was pretty damn hateful to two of the three desert religions.
In fact Hebdo was taken to court twelve times by the Catholic Church for hate speech (A3).
Even members of the Catholic conservative community vocalised their contempt for Hebdo after the shooting, with a top American cardinal calling the cartoonists, “hate filled pornographers”!
The Hebdo gang also ridiculed the murder of white farmers in South Africa on several occasions, and promoted Marxist, sexually deviant and Atheistic ideology to Leftist scum on a weekly basis.
So why are the uninformed masses, on BOTH the ‘Left’ and ‘Right’ supporting these miscreants?
Mainstream media saturation and good ol’ fashioned ignorance….
In fact when one of their cartoonist mildly referenced Nikolas Sarkozy’s Jewish heritage (by saying his son discovered his Jewish roots to make $$$), he was fired, as the following article from the Daily Telegraph explains (A2).
So…is Charlie pro-Jewish?
We asked Jack Sen, UKIP’s parliamentary candidate for West Lancs (now with the BNP) this very question over a dozen pints at a Weatherspoon’s in Manchester this past week.
“I believe Hebdo is part of an internationalist conspiracy to sow discord in France and Western Europe-yet another a mechanism used to weaken national identity so a certain segment of the population can advance tribal interests.
The incendiary cartoons were used to foment hatred, incite sectarian violence, and drum up support for our ludicrous foreign policy. “Jack Sen.
Agreed. Hebdo repeatedly ripped Christianity and Islam, while mollycoddling the Jews.
And unless one attended a Hebdo board meetings or were in the mind of the cartoonists, you will never really know why Judaism was given a free pass, and only Christianity and Islam insulted.” Jack Sen.
Regardless, the fact remains that Hebdo routinely ripped easy targets; Christianity and Islam, and left the Talmudic Jews alone, and THAT needs exposing.
It’s also why I’d like to spit on the sheep on both the left and the right, bandying about, the Je Suis Charlie mantra on twitter, in town and across the globe. (In American, I believe that’s pronounced Je soo-is Chuck).
This Je Suis Charlie rubbish reminds me an awful lot of that nauseating, #Bring Back Our Girls campaign.
Islam is certainly a threat to the west, and I have an enormous amount of contempt for all things Islam, but I will NOT be told who I must hate by the Zionist media. I will decide who I hate on my own-thank you very much!
And for a moment let’s Imagine an American magazine portraying blacks as apes raping one another with bananas, or worse yet, Jews running banks! There’d be hate speech charges levied immediately.
Yet Hebdo received a free pass for far more vicious forms of hate speech.
That’s a double standard and it’s wrong.
FUC$ Je Suis Charlie and the planet’s refuse thinking it’s alright to incite hatred in our lands.
Mark my words: Islamism and Zionism working in conjunction with one another on our soil, will spell end for life as we know it.
Notes – Please be sure to sign up for our newsletter at the top of this page as well as check out our Combating Zionism and Combating Islamism sections, before leaving us today, as well as read John de Nugent’s take on the Hebdo incident.
If someone tries to pass off a magazine cover with Shoah Hebdo on the cover as proof of Hebdo’s even handedness, make sure you tell them to STOP spreading disinformation. Shoah Hebdo is a satirical spin on the original pro Jewish Hebdo. Shoah Hebdo was created by a critic of Hebdo to illustrate Hebdo’s pro-Jewsih hypocrisy. The Zionist patrolling media, passing off this phony mag as Hebdo KNOW this. Make sure you tlel them you do as well.
Also please be sure to SHARE this article on Facebook so we can continue to expose our oppressors.
The truth shall ALWAYS set you free.
As mocking young Mr Sarkozy converted to Judaism for money, Sine was accused of being Anti-Semitic and faced many preassures leading him to be fired from the weekly magazine
World Bulletin/News Desk
Maurice Sinet, 86, who works under the pen name Sine in the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, faced charges of “inciting racial hatred” for a column he wrote in 2009. The piece sparked a slanging match among the Parisian intelligentsia and ended in his dismissal from the magazine.
“L’affaire Sine” followed the engagement of Mr Sarkozy, 22, to Jessica Sebaoun-Darty, the Jewish heiress of an electronic goods chain. Commenting on an unfounded rumour that the president’s son planned to convert to Judaism, Sine quipped: “He’ll go a long way in life, that little lad.”
A high-profile political commentator slammed the column as linking prejudice about Jews and social success. Charlie Hebdo’s editor, Philippe Val, asked Sinet to apologise but he refused in a very strictly manner.
Mr Val’s decision to fire Sine was backed by a group of eminent intellectuals, including the philosopher Bernard-Henry Lévy, but parts of the libertarian Left defended him, citing the right to free speech.
As mocking young Mr Sarkozy converted to Judaism for money, Sine was accused of being Anti-Semitic and faced many preassures leading him to be fired from the weekly magazine. The same magazine published cartoons even insulting the Islam Prophet Muhammad and Muslims yet explained them as “freedom of speech.”
Charlie Hebdo published cartoons about Prophet Jesus and Chiristianity, too, causing the magazine being sued 12 times by Catholic Chuch.
A3. CHARLIE HEBDO PERVERTS FREEDOM THROUGH HATE
January 8, 2015 by Bill
Bill Donohue comments on reactions to his news release from yesterday [click here] on the murder of 12 people in Paris:
Being misrepresented is commonplace for public figures. Sometimes it reflects an honest misreading; other times it is a willful distortion. I don’t have the time now to address all of these instances, but I am hardly going to run from my position.
My position is this: the murderers are fully responsible for what they did and should be treated with the full force of the law. Nothing justifies the killing of these people. But this is not the whole of this issue.
The cartoonists, and all those associated with Charlie Hebdo, are no champions of freedom. Quite the opposite: their obscene portrayal of religious figures—so shocking that not a single TV station or mainstream newspaper would show them—represents an abuse of freedom.
Freedom of speech is not an end—it is a means to an end. For Americans, the end is nicely spelled out in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution: the goal is to “form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”
No fair-minded reading of the Preamble suggests that it was written to facilitate the right to intentionally and persistently insult people of faith with scatological commentary. Moreover, the purpose of free speech is political discourse: it exists to protect the right of men and women to agree and disagree about the makings of the good society.
Let’s forget about legalities. As I have said countless times, everyone has a legal right to insult my religion (or the religion of others), but no one has a moral right to do so. Can we please have this conversation, along with what to do about Muslim barbarians who kill because they are offended?