Convicted Australian leader/activist against Islamization, Blair Cottrell (did a mock Muslim-style beheading video) : Australia has NO constitutional freedom of speech; Aussies have no “right” to criticize the Muslim conquest
Blair Cottrell is appealing his conviction in “Oz” for hate speech, specifically “serious religious vilification.” His group, United Patriots Front, did a video with a mock ISIS-style execution — blood spurting out of the neck of a dummy they beheadedwiht a toy sword — and for that, he and two other activists were sentenced this month by a Melbourne Magistrates Court to fines of Australian $2,079.50.
Here is the seemingly factual but of course extremely slanted and hostile Wiki article on Cottrell’s United Patriots Front:
Every Australian prisoner must hear muslim prayers via a speaker inside his cell
Australia, unlike America, literally has no legal provision for freedom of speech: https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/09/australia-does-not-have-freedom-of-speech/
*** My comment
See below for an article formally confirming this. Of course, while it is great the Americans do have the First Amendment, spelling out free speech boldly in black-and-white, here in the States they resort to (I am bolding the things actually done to me) firing you from your job; your friends and relatives ostracize you; you are disinherited; the Internet fills up with vile slanders against you;
they physically beat you or set fire to your house or car (especially in Germany); the FBI spreads around town that they “want to talk to you”; and they railroad you into prison (Edgar Steele) or poison you (IMO, Jürgen Rieger in Germany, a top WN lawyer and businessman…..
A perfect example is the Thuringia, eastern Germany legislator Uwe Leichsenring — and quite a few others in the NPD party in eastern Germany.
with a ladyfriend
He owned a driving school, yet he accelerated his Mercedes straight into the grill of an oncoming large truck loaded with cinderblocks — in broad daylight and on a flat, straight section of road…. Hmmm.
Or the Deep State bribes, blackmails or incites someone, even a deranged, ego-inflamed white nationalist, to kill you (George Lincoln Rockwell).
In other words, even if there is a free-speech law on the books, they “try to get you in other ways.”
When the full power of the Deep State (the paedophile-run, satanist network which controls the judges, prosecutors, cops, media, businessmen and military) comes down on you and the sheeplike masses merely gawk or even applaud it, and then your fellow WNs (99% of them) do nothing of substance to help you, then one activist after another gets crushed.
I have persevered because I know that 1) a new Aryan, highly organized religion is my mission, 2) this alone can save us from THEIR highly organized hate religions:
Judaism, Islam and Masonry.
More notes from listening to Cottrell:
Islam is a foe to be respected that creates a warlike people, a test, or like an infection that challenges the national immune system. If you refuse to fight back, you have failed the test of nature.
Many suburbs in Australia are not safe for any non-muslim. They have extreme ethnic, religious and geographical segregation, and will never adopt Australian values. Cottell: “If I were born Muslim, I would be out to conquer the West.” You cannot blame them for doing what they were both born genetically and also raised and indoctrinated to do.
Catholics in Oz — the majority –are very aligned with totally unelected “social justice” committees.
Muslims are used as bio-weapons to 1) cause disruption and 2) replace the white Australians.
The Muslims also attack non-whites if they are “infidels.”
Cottrell mentions the 2015 murder of Curtis Cheng, a police-department civilian worker of Chinese heritage by a muslim, just executed, shot in the back of the head IN FRONT OF POLICE HEADQUARTERS.
The Parramatta/Sydney mosque then actually got $4 million in their pocket from the government for a “de-radicalization program”…
On 2 October 2015, Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar, a 15-year-old boy, shot and killed Curtis Cheng, an unarmed police civilian finance worker, outside the New South Wales Police Force headquarters in Parramatta, Australia. Jabar was subsequently shot and killed by special constables who were protecting the headquarters. As of 27 April 2016, four other men have been charged in relation to the shooting.
The government line is the leftist narrarive that 1) the way to stop radicalization is for us infidels to stop “offending” them, and 2) there are lots of peaceful and moderate muslims. (They are that way only while they are a tiny minority.)
(Of course, all refusal to accept Islam, the only true religion, is disobedience to Allah and offensive to Muslims!)
Cottrell is facing in prison :
Only the rural areas, far from the big cities, are still all-white. The cities are filling up with Chinese and Muslims. Landowners are subdividing their lots to build as many tiny apartment units as possible.
Attacks on people getting off the grid as supposedly raising electric prices for everyone else.
There are persistent leftist effort to agitate the aborigines against white Australians, but the pure-blooded ones are not involved, emotionally or otherwise; it is the part-white/part-aborigines who run around acting outraged.
On antifa: In Oz, they are still disorganized and pathetic.
It showed there is no outstanding American leader (so far, not Spencer, for example) who has the charisma, leadership and perhaps working-class background or appeal to rally the masses.
The great movements have been either religious or a political personality cult, but in both cases, they are centered around a person whom people love, admire and want to emulate.
There simply should not be a multiplicity of movements if their real goal is to save whites and protect the nation from the Left. There should be one leader and one movement, and hopefully they will emerge in Australia and in America. “The petty organizations, formed perhaps out of jealousy, then need to submit to that group.”
…..Aussies have NO free speech; it is only implied
Australia Does Not Have Freedom Of Speech
“Free speech” is often raised as a defence in the court of public opinion, particularly when people are called out by their ideological opponents. “You’re attacking my right to free speech!” However, either through forgetfulness or ignorance, many Australians don’t appear to realise free speech is not a legal right they hold.
Australia Does Not Have A Bill Of Rights
The right to free speech has come up frequently in recent times, as the political climate both in Australia and abroad continues to draw heated debate. In the US, individuals often cite their First Amendment rights when they feel they have been censored. Setting aside an analysis of US law, Australia does not have any equivalent. Unlike the US, Australia does not have a bill of rights, and in fact is the only Western liberal democracy not to have one.
There has been some debate regarding whether Australia needs a bill of rights. Arguments for a bill include that by having a reference point, people will be able to more effectively enforce their rights. Arguments against a bill include that by defining rights we would by nature be limiting them. In Kruger v The Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1, Dawson J stated, “The framers [of the Constitution] preferred to place their faith in the democratic process for the protection of individual rights.”
The Australian Constitution does not expressly guarantee many rights or freedoms, though it does guarantee a small handful (such as freedom of trade between the states in s 92). Freedom of speech is not one of them.
Australia Does Have An Implied Right To Political Speech
While Australia does not have an explicit freedom of speech, it does have an implied freedom of political speech. Freedom of political speech was first recognised in Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1, the High Court of Australia finding this right was implied in Australia’s Constitution. It is the nature of a democratic society to require freedom of political speech, as if the country is to be led by the people (or individuals representing the people’s interests), then the people must be heard, and be able to develop informed opinions.
This cannot be used as a claim to the right of free speech generally. The High Court of Australia subsequently ruled that this implied freedom only protects against laws that infringe upon political speech, which is restricted to matters that may influence voter’s decisions at the poll.
In the case of Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520, former New Zealand Prime Minister David Lange sued the ABC for defamation, and the ABC raised the implied freedom of political speech as a defence. In a unanimous decision, McHugh J said, “Those sections [of the Constitution that imply freedom of political speech] do not confer personal rights on individuals. Rather they preclude the curtailment of the protected freedom by the exercise of legislative or executive power.” Therefore, the implied freedom of political speech cannot be used as a defence to defamation.
Though the Australian government generally cannot legislate to restrict or burden freedom of political speech, there are exceptions. Laws can be made restricting political speech where the law serves a legitimate purpose (in that it is compatible with the maintenance of a representative and responsible government), is suitable to achieve its purpose, is necessary (there is no less restrictive alternative), and the importance of its purpose outweighs the weight of the restriction. If a law fails any of these tests, it is invalid.
However, this is the extent to which the implied freedom of political speech provides protection. It does not protect from an acquaintance shutting you down in conversation, a forum administrator deleting your comments, or an event organiser denying you a platform to speak due to your subject matter. Even if your statements concerned political matters, you are not being rejected due to a law restricting your speech, so your implied right of political speech is inapplicable. You can say what you want, but others are under no obligation to listen or give you a platform.
The Australian government cannot legislate to restrict your freedom of political speech, but you cannot use “freedom of political speech” as a defence.
Australia Does Not Have An Enforceable International Obligation To Uphold Freedom Of Speech
Australia is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which enshrines freedom of opinion and expression at Article 19. However, the main consequence Australia would face were it to ignore the treaty is international condemnation. As demonstrated by Australia’s apparent indignation at international condemnation regarding its treatment of asylum seekers, Australia could, in theory, disregard the treaty and restrict such expression with little tangible repercussion.
Though “freedom of speech” has become the rallying cry for those who feel that their opinions are unfairly vilified, there is no clear law that Australians can point to regarding a right to free speech. In fact, Australians are subject to a variety of laws restricting free speech, including defamation laws, hate speech laws, sexual harassment laws, and laws against threatening others. While desirable in theory, truly free speech would open up vulnerable people to intimidation and attack. Some restriction upon speech facilitates the operation of a representative and responsible democracy by fostering an environment in which marginalised people feel safe to speak up. [JdN: Yeah, yeah, snowflake… As an East Asian you demand no white can criticize you.]So the next time your obnoxious uncle comes to visit and starts in on a racist rant, kindly remind him that free speech isn’t a thing in Australia. And regardless of the state of Australian law, you’re still well within your rights to kick him out of your house.
……Especially important blogs by John de Nugent
Psychopathy in leaders
Jews and Arabs descend from neanderthals
WN bio of JdN
UFOs, the Reich AFTER ’45, and whites as colonists on this planet
The 1917 Van Rensburg prophecy of three world wars — and a German final victory marches toward its fulfillment —
Solutreans – the white first Americans
The Jewish murder-war on the Kennedys
Captain Ramsay’s “The Nameless War“ – how the Jews do revolution
Youtube channel JdN
Normans – white nordic aristocrats who married with Jews to create the current Judeo-Anglo-American ruling class
White safety zone – Upper Peninsula of Michigan
White South African tragedy
Hitler’s moral and strategic disaster in Russia
Hitler’s love for the British people
My wonderful British grandfather and his eery return
Part 1 of 2 .https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBfrG5aMWj0
Part 2 of 2 .https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o3AwvcsDEA
Who really IS JdN?
Hitler’s Landsberg prison cell in 1924
President Putin uses my website to send Trump a message
The Obama White House calls me directly with a threat
The Hebrews of the Bible were roaming criminal hordes
Washington Post blasts JdN
My lady Margaret Huffstickler on Reichsmusik
If my site goes down, please try www.jdnmirror.com or https://www.europeanknightsproject.com/john-de-nugent/ If my Facebook account is suspended or deleted, please go to https://vk.com/johndenugent
…..Contact and support
John de Nugent
306 South Steel Street
Ontonagon MI 49953
Telephone: +1 (906) 884-6689
(Excellent, free-speech Russian answer to Facebook)
Jewish owner Mark Zuckerberg has deleted me twice for un-p.c. posts
Skype: John de Nugent (Ontonagon)
……Recent donations to John de Nugent
–19 September 2017 from D in Australia
–18 September 2017 from A in Russia
–18 September 2017 via Stripe from U in Germany
–12 September 2017 check from G in Nevada
–5 September 2017 check from G in Cicero, Illinois
–30 August 2017 Stripe from a Dr. Mengele/Brazil
–29 August 2017 check from J in Maryland
–28 August 2017 check from G in Cicero, Illinois
–28 August 2017 via PayPal from C in Germany
–24 August 2017 via PayPal from L in Scotland
–23 August 2017 via Stripe from C in Maryland
–22 August 2017 donation via Stripe from S in USA and from P in Australia
–21 August 2017 loan from J in Australia
–21 August 2017 check from G in Utah
–15 August 2017 check by an NS old fighter from out west
–8 August 2017 PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org from D in French Canada
–7 August 2017 check from G in Nevada
–6 August 2017 pymt made for me by P in Albania (inside joke 😉 )
–5 August 2017 cash from M in Oregon
–5 August 2017 a jar of Napoleon garlic cloves from M in Michigan (Does this mean I should remember to avoid invading Russia?)
–5 August 2017 from R in Michigan a wonderful little book by Eckhart Tolle, Practicing the Power of Now
–3 August 2017 check from P in Florida direct to my webhost
–2 August 2017 check from K in Ohio
–31 July 2017 check from G in Cicero, Illinois
–25 July 2017 check from G in Nevada
–22 July 2017 PayPal to email@example.com from M in Floridak.com fr