by John Bull – his words, passion and faith in Great Britain and our lord & saviour Jesus Christ.
In a recent article in the left wing Guardian newspaper the doctrine of ‘cultural Marxism’ was labelled a conspiracy theory. This article demonstrates that not only does cultural marxism exist but that it makes sure our lives can often be inhibited and our freedom of expression stamped down on.
Freedom of Speech or lack thereof…
Most Marxist systems include as many restrictions on freedom of speech as possible. This is mainly due to the dishonest nature and flaws in Marxist thinking. A Marxist system will attempt to ‘paper-over’ when cracks appear by enforcing political arrests and censorship. Currently all mainstream media outlets are Marxist dominated by the Zionist system. The only place where true freedom of expression exists is on the internet. Although steps have been made to shut this down. Marxist Zionist Jay Rockefeller a few years ago, expressed a will to shutdown the internet, stating it ‘should never have existed’ for the masses.
The Marxist pseudo right-wing Tory party in Britain have also been making more active efforts to restrict freedom of expression online. They expressed a will to outlaw pornography, which on the surface seems a good moral argument. However with the porn they also planned to ban ‘conspiracy websites’. In this we see an example of how Marxists will attempt to appear as angels of light whilst spreading their dark restrictive claws.
More recently Marxist Zionist Teresa May exploited various recent and inevitable muslim terrorist attacks to backup government plans to limit what people are and are not allowed to say online. Whilst it appears a reaction to Islamic terrorism we on the right know that if they really wanted to restrict Islamic terrorism in the west they would have shut the flood gates years ago. May’s comments left a lot of ambiguity as she stated aims to “restrict fanatics who spread hate but cannot be prosecuted as they have not broken the law.” In this brave new world May fails to specify exactly who or what can be prosecuted. This leaves the Marxists in power space to prosecute whoever they wish for whatever they deem criminal. It is not as if Marxist restriction on freedom of speech is not already a powerful entity in most European countries. In Britain many people have been jailed by the thought police for up to a year for ‘racist’ comments on Twitter or Facebook. A law called the malicious communications act allows them a lot of scope for people simply expressing an opinion or anger in the heat of the moment. Any famous or establishment person that even makes a hint of a ‘racist’ remark will face being bullied out of their livelihood. Football manager Malkay Mackay was recently the subject of a marxist media witch hunt after private phone calls were somehow recorded and reported to the press. Indeed privacy is not something the Marxist thought police respect. Both public and private views are continually policed and picked at for all the unfortunate denizens of the system.
Perhaps among the worst thought crime sentances that have been handed out post World War 2 were to the likes of Ernst Zundel and other ‘holocaust revisionists’. Just for questioning certain aspects of the establishment consensus of history they have been given lengthy prison terms. Whilst it is ok for communists to gloat about the deaths of many at the hands of bloody Marxist regimes; simply questioning the official version of history regarding the holocaust is sacrosanct to any Marxist system. In many countries it is a more serious crime than physical assault!
Zundel has served at least 5 years in jail for crimes such as ‘incitement for Holocaust denial’. One of many contemporaries Dr Frederick Toben has also served years in jail for among other things crimes of ‘defaming the dead’. During their trials both men were also victims of many vindictive trumped up charges which are a typical feature of any Marxist clamping down on speech that threatens their regime. Dirty tricks, censorship and massive bias is always present in any Marxist ‘kangaroo court’ as the German soldiers found out at the end of WW2. Many of the ‘racist’ charges would be laughable if it was not for what they entail. A father and son were recently jailed for a number of months for among other things saying a police officer looked like Mr T.
At the extreme of Marxist rule we can see that freedom of speech can become a very serious ‘crime’ indeed. In communist Soviet Russia if a Marxist judge deemed someone to be an ‘anti-Semite’ they could and often did face life imprisonment (in a gulag) or the death penalty. Are we seeing the seeds of this more hardline Marxist thinking being sewn in Europe today. As Brussels and the Marxist ‘Court of Human Rights’ is being given more and more power to restrict free thinking. Indeed children in schools these days are more indoctrinated than ever. Schools are as much institutions of learning practical skills such as reading and writing as they are indoctrination centers for obedient drones of the Marxist system.
A good example of how tough Marxist schooling comes down on any expression of racial difference or awareness is in the case of seven-year old Elliot Dearlove. For simply asking a schoolmate whether he was ‘brown because he was from Africa’ the school called in the child’s mother and attempted to make her sign a creepy form, stating her son was ‘a racist’. Innocent three year olds are now absurdly being labelled as bigots for showing a natural racial preference in their nurseries. Indeed the ‘guilty’ three year-old’s are being reported to local authority. Perhaps they would make good candidates for the alleged government run pedophile rings.
Marxist Athiesm – The ‘Godless Communist’
If we can agree the end goal of Marxism is a one world communist order then we can also see that Marxism’s effects on religion. Very few socialists are christian and communism requires that the follower is atheist. Even Hitler’s hardline nationalist regime allowed ‘positive Christianity’. Although it is true that the national socialist regime in Germany during the 30’s and early 40’s did have a large totalitarian aspect. It was mostly geared around stopping communists and their anarchic tendencies. Christianity was very much legal as was ‘freedom of religion’. Although the controlled churches do not like to admit it many of their catholic and protestant forbears during the national socialist regime were fond collaborators and supporters of National Socialism. Most nationalist or fascist regimes admittedly have some similarity with the far left in the totalitarian aspect. But the key difference is that communists are parasitic in nature and rely on draining the rich and other skilled peoples. Fascism has a policy whereby if you do not like it you are free to leave. But also that you are free to earn a good living and use your god given creativity to be better than someone else. Communism (or marxism) always aims to ‘mop up’ its shortcomings by hard labour (in a gulag) and eventually if not sooner by execution; death.
Let us compare another factor of Marxist thinking that affects our everyday life. In the early part of the last century and much of the one before that there was an economic boom in white nations. This was due in part to the industrial revolution as creative white minds began harvesting natural resources such as coal to feed our new machines (inventions) in production. To keep the wealth from white invention and white industry one must restrict trade and limit research to other nations. Buying cheap imports from the third world would most definitely be verboten under and nationalist government (or at the very least heavily restricted). Not only is it morally wrong (taking jobs away from our own kinsfolk) but it is economic suicide. One can Observe how during successive Marxist controlled Tory and Labour governments our once great car industry has dramatically shrunk. Japanese imports are promoted while British brands such as Rover are presented as old-fashioned and unreliable. Car plants were shut down nationwide in preference to outsourcing the work abroad where it could be completed cheaper (often with questionable quality). Most large establishment companies (for example in the shoe industry) such as Nike and Adidas send all their useful production over to communist China. The Marxist tendency to undermine our own production and outsource it to the third world is designed to not only weaken our own economy but allow third world nations that would otherwise be in squalor to artificially grow in power and population. No prizes for guessing where that population overspill ends up; over here with a nice packet of benefits each month. During Hitler’s national socialist regime employment reached an all time high. By 1938, unemployment was practically extinct. Wages increased by 10.9% in real terms during this period. Germany simply did not need others and their parasitic baggage and employed a trade policy of Autarky. The government invented schemes to include its own Volk in building the nation’s industry and economic power. It was all geared around the good nature and readiness of the German worker. Compare this to a glum and uninspiring visit to the job centre on a wet Wednesday in modern day Britain. Not much prospects there.
The greatest impact that Marxism has had on our nation must be immigration. It truly is a beast with many ugly heads and many woeful impacts on our indigenous people. Not only is the Marxist fallacy that ‘we are all equal’ genetically incorrect it is also highly hypocritical in practice. The fact that there is an Equality Commission to accommodate the shortcomings of low IQ alien races is an hypocrisy in itself. Of course they would argue that other races are discriminated against. But in reality we see a very unequal justice system where non-whites can do no wrong whilst if whites dare to even verbally express discontent they can be hunted down by special branch and imprisoned. Such as the recent incident with some rowdy Chelsea fans. The idea of all races being equal is a utopian fantasy. Not all races are equal, indeed not all peoples are equal. Everyone has talents and shortcomings. The forced molding of ‘equality’ in Marxist society is as contrived as it is hypocritical. As Aristotle once said; “The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.”
So in employment Marxists use diversity schemes and quotas which results in non-whites been given favorable treatment in certain circumstances to their white equivalents for any particular job. Undeniable Hypocrisy. Whilst Marxists claim to love ‘diversity’ one can clearly see that Earth on a world scale is (or was) highly diverse. Whilst it is Africa for the Africans and Asia for the Asians, the self-righteous Marxist zealots seem to think White countries are to become a melting pot. In reality Marxists are not pro-diversity. In the 2011 British census white Britain’s for the first time became a minority in their own capital city (London). At the time making just 44.9% of the demographic. This white decline has been repeated in all major cities in Britain and the ‘diversity’ crowd are not complaining.
If one can step out of the enforced dogma of Marxist thinking one can see a vast difference in race based on genetics. Although it is often argued that a monkey has 95% the same DNA as a human it is very clear we are in no way the same species. Similarly there are differences in genetics and genetic averages and trends between races. Generally sub-Saharan Africans have far less IQ than white Europeans and black men in general have a far higher propensity to commit violent crime than white men. This can be proven by the sheer number of black on white crime in all white nations as oppose to the same in reverse. Of course the Marxist will blame this on ‘discrimination’ and a cycle of poor ‘underprivileged’ upbringing. There are to this day plenty of poor whites brought up around violence and prejudice. However does being ‘discriminated against’ make an individual want to go around murdering and raping? Or is it due perhaps to factors such as black male testosterone levels being on average far higher than that of whites or Asians. Liberals say you ‘cannot generalise’. Why not? We are allowed to generalise when we make jokes about Scots being tight or Irish liking beer. But generalising about blacks being violent or asians being sneaky is verboten? It is very much like telling someone if they look up during a clear day they won’t see the sun then every time that person looks skywards holding a piece of card in front of their eyes. Then if they continue to look up forcing them into a dark gulag, devoid of all light.
Of course any nationalist regime is happy to study both nature and nurture with an open mind in the case of race. It will not ignore obvious trends in racial behavior because frankly it is childish and immature in the extreme. In fact denying truth when it is placed in front of you.
A nationalist regime would look at immigration from the perspective of if it can benefit its own people. If the answer is ‘no’ then immigration must be reversed and restricted. This is what many would call common sense when it comes to the well-being of indigenous people. Liberals would argue it is cruel to shut out all other kinds of peoples from reaping the benefits of a white first world nation. This is understandable and where possible segregation could be introduced as it ran in America and South Africa for a long untroubled period. That way the whites could still assist non-white communities whilst avoiding the violent pitfalls of multiculturalism.
Marxist governments are devils for foreign aid. Much of our struggling economy is shipped to such projects as the third world Indian Space Program or other corrupt third world regimes where the money is often embezzled by their corrupt governments.
£12 Billion is the figure planned in 2015. The Marxist policy on foreign aid is very much like a life-support machine keeping someone who is brain dead alive artificially. Whilst that person is unable to contribute to the world in any practical way it has a feeding tube keeping it alive (or rather keeping the populations high). Of course all the third worlders that would otherwise have starved end up coming to our lands and enrolling on our benefits system anyway. As nationalists often joke it is birth control they need to ship to Africa not tins of sardines.
As I mentioned massive third world immigration is a curse that is much like a multi-headed hideous hydra. There are everyday effects that people will conveniently never be reminded of in the Marxist Zionist media. One of those is road traffic levels. People always complain about being stuck in ‘porridge’ out on the road. But do they know just how much massive immigration by successive Marxist governments has impacted on our small Island population? No wonder you cannot get to work when Mohammed and his four daughters and five sons are out on the road at the same time. No wonder insurance companies are reaping the benefits of their questionable driving skills.
How much has the number claiming benefits been mentioned as an issue in Britain in the mainstream media? Do the politicians ever suggest re-repatriation for a few of the huge numbers of foreigners eating up tax money each year? Do they heck. There will just be another ‘problem’ single white mother article in the Daily Fail. There are Romanian migrants building houses back home with ‘free’ money they picked up on their little holiday in Britain. Of course in a nationalist regime the welfare system would be designed for the needy of the indigenous people. Whilst under the current system fraudulent claims are rife there is little chance of that kind of behavior being tolerated under any nationalist regime.
It hardly needs mentioning but of course crime levels have gone up with immigration. Old English people will remember fondly the days when they could leave their front doors unlocked. Alas no more. Whilst English people have been hunted down and arrested for ‘offensive tweets’ Muslims have been free all over the country to exploit young vulnerable English girls for prostitution. It was recently discovered 1400 cases had been covered up by the Marxist establishment in just Rotherham alone. Obviously the behavior of any Marxist run nations enriching ‘guests’ does not reflect their narrative (that we are all equal). Therefore they use their media outlets to convey their own utopian fantasy on crime. Whilst non-white murders and rapes go on everyday the Marxist media will attempt to report on as little of it as they can. A collection of violent non-white crime reports can be found here. Whilst the brutality of many crimes committed by non-whites such as that against Kriss Donald. Or the brutal murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. The media with its politically correct blinkers will chose to bring up the Stephen Lawrence murder for the umpteenth time. Lawrence’s mother has since become a Baroness. I wonder if any such honor or photo opportunities were sought with the mother of Kriss Donald?
A good example of how media tries to bend reality was seen during the London Riots of 2011. In one case Kay Burley a reporter with Sky News interviews a man live on the street during the riots. He simply states the fact that ‘100 to 200 black youths’ were tearing the area up. The Marxist reporter immediately attempts to hide the racial reference in a rather stuttering and bumbling fashion. Of course the media also posted many articles with pictures where they had deliberately picked out the few white faces during a majority black massive criminal event. This is a trick they reproduce often and a good example can be seen in this article where the issue involves recent sex abuse that the vast majority of which was committed by asian often Muslim men. Of course the stock image they have sourced shows a white man.
This is standard practice and what many do not realise is that the media is always trying to even out the racial factor in crime by lying and censoring. Of course bias will exist in all regimes but never has the facts been covered up more than in the case of ethnic minority crime and Zionist Marxist media. As Goebbels once said (concerning propaganda); “Its foundation is that there is nothing the people cannot understand, but rather things must be put in a way that they can understand. It is a question of making it clear to him by using the proper approach, evidence, and language.” In other words a nationalist government will simply have to tell the everyday truths that we preach in the obscure corners of the internet. We do not need manipulative articles and smear campaigns. The nationalist walks in the natural laws of common sense, honesty and virtue.
Of course the core of most Marxist systems as it goes hand in hand with their ideology; is the proletariat or the working man. Marxists are masters of rabble rousing. They will get up on a soapbox and point out the shortcomings of a system to those at the bottom and make promises about how their lives will be better when the upper classes and capitalism is overthrown. In reality the white working classes are as despised by the Marxists as any of the white gentry. Whilst the old left-wing value of being ‘for the worker’ still exists, it is equally for replacing white workers with non-white third worlders. For examples well paid union leader Bob Crow (god rest his soul) was not only fiercely socialist but also a well paid Marxist. Indeed on occasion he kicked fellow white workers out of jobs for being members of the nationalist British Nationalist Party. Judging by the amount of holidays he had he was also what you might call a ‘champagne socialist’. The leadership of most Marxist regimes needs its fair share of well paid sociopaths, but those working underneath rarely get such rewards.
Nationalism; ‘British jobs for British workers’ – its not rocket science! How much the worker receives in comparison to those higher up depends on where the nationalist regime places itself economically. But in the case of corrupt banks and loan sharks there would be no role. Whilst those that are ambitious and want to work hard in business are free to do so as long as they are honest and ethical in their business conduct. The capitalist banks that committed mass fraud such as Goldmann Sachs would be in prison where they belong.
The Marxist likes to build on stereotypes associated with nationalist or patriotic movements and at the time of writing is currently busy smearing UKIP and Nigel Farage at a level clearly much higher than the establishment parties. There have been two feature length smear films on UKIP alone on mainstream media in the past week (at the time of writing). ‘Don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story’ as the saying goes. Every pathetic piece of gossip is pounced upon to target ‘evil fascist’ UKIP. Such as this recent non-story about Farage having his photo taken with one of those insidious ‘Chelsea racists’.
Overall a nationalist government run by the people for the people is heaven compared to the current Marxist system. In so many ways as discussed in this article (but many not covered also) it is beneficial to European people. It is time that we grew a spine and realised that being a christian does not mean you allow everyone to walk over and abuse you. We need to re-discover the manly Christianity of old where we took responsibility for our women and children. That we made sure their futures are not some Orwellian nightmare in a Marxist system that hates them just because of who they are.