“Modern art is Communistic because it is distorted and ugly…It does not glorify our beautiful countries and therefore it’s opposed to our government and culture. Those who create and promote it are our enemies.”U.S. Rep. George Dondero [R-Michgan 18, 1953-1956]
For those of you fearful of truth, I’d ask you visit foxnews.com or better yet msnbc.com.
One technique subversives are proficient at is passing off filth, and that which is ugly, as artistic and beautiful. Mainstream art pundits, men like Moshe Feinstein claim that “art is a mere reflection of the times”, but what if art is being utilized as an instrument, even weapon to influence change, instead of being merely a product of it? Just think about what’s being passed off as modern art, music and pop culture today. Survey the music that is garnering awards and critical acclaim. Lady Gaga, Marilyn Manson, Amy Winehouse, Courtney Love, Katie Perry and other subversive shills have all won Grammy Awards for their contribution to music, while American icon, John Fogerty of Creedence Clearwater Revival notoriety, had to wait decades for recognition from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences. Look at which group controls the music industry and what they are motivated by.
Have a gander at the people involved in art punditry; the people behind the prestigious Guggenheim award and Turner Prize. See a common denominator? The background of the men and women dictating what has value and what does not, has changed little since the late 19th century when masters like Arnold Böcklin (Isle of the dead, pictured above right), Ferdinand Oehme (Burg Scharfenberg bei Nacht pictured right) and other symbolist geniuses were marginalized so that degenerate art could be sold to the public.
In defense of Europe’s move towards subversive abstract and Marxist degenerative art, Clement Greenberg wrote that the work of European classical and symbolist artists, Böcklin in particular was “the most consummate expression of all that’s disliked from the latter half of the nineteenth century..”
Disliked by whom? And for what ulterior motive, Mr Greenberg?
During the 1920s CPUSA members (the Communist Party of the USA) received written instruction from Moscow to promote non-representational or abstract art so that the US’s “public space would become gloomy and ugly”. The Soviets, following the lead of Marxist theoreticians like Antonio Gramsci, a Jewish Italian, believed that Americans, like their Western European counterparts, were resistant to Marxist subversion on a political level, as generally speaking life was good. They believed that societal subversion through the theories pushed by radicals in Germany’s Frankfurt School would sap Americans’ will to resist Communist ideology and facilitate an eventual Communist coup. The explicit objective was to erode the confidence of America’s ruling WASP elite and create an ideological vacuum to be filled by Marxism-Leninism.
Economic communism resulted in abject poverty, human suffering & death everywhere it was implemented-as planned by it’s Zionist creators. The problem was it had little impact on Western Europe. The communist expectation of the worldwide worker revolt the genocidal Bolsheviks had in mind simply did not take root in Europe. People were too fiercely proud of their nations and had no interest in joining some nonsensical global worker’s struggle. The fact that it was a con only added to Western Europeans aversion to the Communistic rabble rousers polluting their lands, and their false ideology. Still, that did not stop them.
Zionist Marxist philosopher, Antonio Gramsci proposed a form of cultural communism, commonly referred to as cultural Marxism, via the Frankfurt School. If you are not familiar with Gramsci’s diabolical writings, he surmised that Marxism could only make inroads in wealthy “happy” western societies by subverting existing institutions. In other words, complete hegemony over cultural institutions (media, academia, political parties, churches) was necessary to tear society down. Any surprise US president Obama names Gramsci as his biggest ideological influence?
The Frankfurt school were a ragtag group of predominantly anti-Western Marxist and predominately Jewish racists with an axe to grind. To call them academics or social scientists would be giving them FAR too much credit.
Being forcibly removed from Germany during the rise of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), the Frankfurt School set up shop at Columbia University in NY, where they experienced infiltrated “popular music, radio, television, and other forms of mass culture” (Wiggershaus 1994) The school consisted of dissident Marxists who believed the west could ONLY be subverted through a consistent attack on its culture, religion and traditions. Criticism of the school is often seen as an anti-semitic canard, however the fact remains that Felix Weil, Georg Lukács, Karl Korsch, Karl August Wittfogel, Friedrich, Antonio Gramsci, Max Horkheimer, Carl Grunberg, Theodore Adorno, Leo Lowenthal, Herbert Marcuse, Franz Neumann, Otto Kirchheimer, Friedrich Pollock-the founding members of the exiled school, were all Jewish. They were exiled from Germany for their Marxist activities, NOT their ethnicity.
After forcibly removed from Germany during the rise of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), the Frankfurt School set up shop at Columbia University in NY, where they experienced infiltrated “popular music, radio, television, Thus began the demise of western civilisation. For more information on this intriguing and highly controversial subject, please join us on www.europeanknightsproject.org and peruse our vast catalogue of articles dedicated to combating cultural Marxism. For now let us concentrate on the reclamation of our glorious art.
We at EK believe that our culture is inherently beautiful and any attempt to subvert it should be met with ferocious opposition. While our enemy is responsible for much of the misery we see in our midst, our art should reflect all that we hold dear. We should resist their perversion with every fibre of our beings! Still, we are in quite a quandary as art will, and should to a certain extent, reflect life. Sadly, much of our modern music is a reactionary response to the misery our oppressors have perpetrated against us via their subversion.
As we’ve done with our good name, we shall reclaim art, beauty and sexuality from our oppressors!
One need only compare the classical beauty we found on our silver screens and stage in years past, to the likes of Sarah Jessica Parker and Mila Kunis, women being sold as the contemporary female ideal by our oppressors in Hollywood today, to know we are being conned. Is Mila Kunis really the most beautiful woman alive? Sarah Jessica Parker the female ideal? The EKP breaks down the Marxist beauty myth in this new article. Also please feel free to leave a comment below & join us again.
I ask that people take a few moments to subscribe to our free monthly newsletter, bookmark our page and if you’re really ballsy, send us an email inquiring about our upcoming EKP camp.
Lastly, do any of you want to do some real good? or continue to pretend you’re a Game of Thrones character for the remainder of your lives. Send us an email on email@example.com if you’re interested in making a difference.
by Jack Sen