This article on the bad Bishop John Inge is part of Carl Mason and Herbert Mulrooney’s Dopey Lefties and Toxic Commie Dreamers series
“Look, I hate no one. But when someone is presented with evidence that a certain demographic presents a danger to the country, preys upon women, and is a threat to national security, and still spews the same destructive and evil left wing talking points, madness has to be diagnosed….And when that person is a bloody Bishop? He needs to be removed from his position of authority. Carl Mason and Herbert Mulrooney’s articles exposes a man that not only needs his head examined, but his licence to speak to people as a man of the cloth, revoked. ” Jack Sen, British Renaissance Policy Institute.
Cop a look at this arch-idiot (see title photo), the Bishop of Worcester, the Rt Reverend Dr John Inge. A Lord Spiritual proud of his role in Common Purpose, his links with Worcester University and a member of the World Development Movement. Worcester University is, like other universities, responsible for reams of immigrants to this island (often without any expectation that the ‘student’ will do any studying at all) and in particular for Worcester’s growing non-white population. What is that motivates our apparent spiritual leaders to take the easy route, despite being of a religion based on heroic martyrdom and defending right above all?
Perhaps the Bishop and other lefties are more susceptible to indoctrination (and the dopey face indicates that it shouldn’t be ruled out), or perhaps they are in it for the money and career advancement. Whatever it is, his dog collar is nothing but a buffer to hide behind while he preaches his warped Christian ideology. He uses his platforms in the Worcester News and the pulpit to insist that Britain takes in at least 50,000 Syrian families. ‘Taking in’ of course means ‘taking on’: housing, feeding and lavishing benefits on them, providing them greater material well-being than our own people. It is not just resources we lose at a time we can ill afford to, but everything we have, our history, our culture, our people.
And losing it to conmen: in Denmark 90% of “refugees” lie about their country of origin, and 75% lie about their age. Those numbers might be a little more merciful in Britain (and a little worse in Sweden and Germany), but what is known is that thousands of “unaccompanied children” arrive in Britain every year, each costing local councils up to £70,000 annually until they are 25. Yet once settled, they’ll happily boast of their real age and how happy the British were to believe their lies.
The human cost is even greater, as non-white immigrants commit crimes such us rape, murder, credit card fraud, drug trafficking and poaching at enormous rates. Does the Bishop see this? Perhaps his dog collar is too tight? Or perhaps its not tight enough! Inge is an accomplice, witting or otherwise, to the Kalergi plan, even though it means pain and ultimately the end for his own relatives and flock. If he needs an example even closer to home, he might want to meditate on how Muslims treated the Bishop of Damascus.
The Bishop probably does know the effects and goals of immigration engineered by the establishment and is not transfixed by a future multicultural utopian rainbow. He and his communist handlers work towards the goals of the Kalergi plan, which is for Europe to be populated by a hybrid race of negroid/mongoloids (his words, not ours), as good Christian soldiers would. This indulgence to gain entry to heaven will be the end of every White Christian the world over.
The Bishop is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, a judas and a fabian. If he really wanted to help his fellow man, he could do so in Jordan, not invite those in refugee camps to cross Europe and enter Britain. Just as a home protects a family, a nation’s borders protects a race. It is those like Inge who would tear them down to embark on Kalergian genetic engineering. Any resistance will be met with the same tired canards and -ists that have worked until now, and the British and Europeans will be reminded that they are actually the victimisers for having ever wanted borders.
Europe will soon experience the most severe consequences of not having borders, far beyond being merely parasitised and reading of horrors in the newspapers. One possibility is that Britain fades away, slowly cleansed by different fertility rates, and the Muslims (who no doubt have their own plans) can pick at the carcass and use White women however they want. Another is that Europe will wake up one morning to find itself in a state of civil war, an ethno-racial religious war of extermination during which no prisoners will be taken. Is this what Inge wants? It is certainly what the Zionists want, for Islam and the West to destroy each other. Since the destruction of the twin towers in New York, we’ve seen a simultaneous war in the Middle East where White men die for Zionist interests, and the creation of a future conflict over here. Both are funded by money-printing Zionists, while governments are short of funds for services the British need.
It has been 50 years since Enoch Powell tried to warn us of this outcome, and there is now no way this can be settled democratically. It probably never could have been, elections are easy to rig, and not even necessary given the extent of media power or the ability to do what was done to Geert Wilders. The only solutions to the problems the British have are conflict and mass deportation. One can only hope the Bishop lives long enough to see it, currently it is too easy for him not living in a Muslim area, and blaming all other white people for what happened in Rotherham, Oxford, Stoke and dozens of other towns, as well as the murders of Lee Rigby, Kriss Donaldson, Charlene Downes and thousands more. All these crimes and many others are the fault of the Bishop and other White traitors.